Student Leaders in Kenya Reject the New Funding Model
University Student leaders in Kenya have spoken out against the government’s recently implemented New Funding Model (NFM) for education. The Student Leaders in Kenya Reject the New Funding Model claiming that the model falls short of their demands and jeopardizes the basic basis of an equitable educational system.
The New University Funding Model which proposes a tiered approach to funding students based on their financial need and academic merit while involving different parties from the parents, educators, and students is not what the Kenyans need.
Majority are calling out the weaknesses that could undermine both the quality and accessibility of education in Kenya. They claim that it’s implementation has shown serious flaws that could jeopardize Kenya’s educational system’s accessibility as well as its quality. Here is a look at some of the major issues with this model.
Distribution of Resources Unequally
NFM might causing inequality in Kenya’s educational system is one of the main problems with it. The methodology does not address the differences in educational outcomes between schools in different locations, even though it claims to base resource allocation on students’ socioeconomic requirements. Richer metropolitan schools frequently offer better facilities, more experienced instructors, and a stronger network of student support services.
On the other hand, limited resources for instruction and poor infrastructure plague schools in remote or neglected areas. Even with a new funding strategy, kids in less affluent areas will still be at a disadvantage due to this unequal playing field.
Vagueness in It’s Implementation
A significant shortcoming of the NFM is the vagueness around its execution.
There are questions about accountability and openness regarding the government’s lack of clarity in its communication regarding the precise distribution and monitoring of funding.
The uncertainty around the amount, timing, and management of the funds leaves schools and other institutions struggling.
As we report, some schools have already reported funding delays. The smooth operation of academic programs could be hampered by these delays, which would interrupt the educational process.
Lack of Stakeholder Involvement
It appears that political expediency overshadowed sincere interaction with stakeholders in the education sector in the establishment of the NFM.
Major stakeholders such parents, educators, school administrators, and teachers were not involved in the whole planning.
Incorporating input from all stakeholders is essential for an inclusive approach on an issue as important as education financing.
This could cause animosity, a sense of not belonging, and ultimately opposition to the policy’s execution.
Parting Shot
An inadequate funding approach that lacks consistency and predictability would not be able to adequately meet the demands of Kenya’s educational system.
Explainer of the New University Funding Model Bands
Call Centre Intern at Standard Investment Bank
Assembly Manager at Star Plastics Ltd
Job Vacancies at Kenya Medical Research Institute – KEMRI
